Eritrea vs Gambia: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per capita
Eritrea
751.38 units per person
in 2011
Gambia
786.01 units per person
in 2025
Eritrea rank
197th
Gambia rank
196th
Gdp worldbank constant usd, per capita over time
- Eritrea
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 786.01 units per person against 751.38 units per person in Eritrea, a difference of 34.63 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Gambia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 197th and Gambia ranks 196th of 209 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 812.94 units per person | 625.91 units per person | 187.02 units per person | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 805.05 units per person | 661.05 units per person | 144 units per person | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 727.63 units per person | 663.24 units per person | 64.38 units per person | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp worldbank constant usd, per capita, Eritrea or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 786.01 units per person against 751.38 units per person in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp worldbank constant usd, per capita between Eritrea and Gambia?
- 34.63 units per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Gambia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Gambia rank globally for gdp worldbank constant usd, per capita?
- Eritrea ranks 197th and Gambia ranks 196th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gdp worldbank constant usd, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gdp worldbank constant usd divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.