Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Nepal: GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2.88 current international $ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Nepal
4.02 current international $ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
17th
Nepal rank
14th

GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Nepal
0246199020072025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 4.02 current international $ per US$ of GDP against 2.88 current international $ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 1.14 current international $ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th and Nepal ranks 14th of 47 groups.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 3.16 current international $ per US$ of GDP 5.37 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.21 current international $ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2000s 3.18 current international $ per US$ of GDP 5.24 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.06 current international $ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2010s 2.57 current international $ per US$ of GDP 3.36 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.7901 current international $ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2020s 2.93 current international $ per US$ of GDP 3.81 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.879 current international $ per US$ of GDP Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Nepal?
Nepal, at 4.02 current international $ per US$ of GDP against 2.88 current international $ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Nepal?
1.14 current international $ per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Nepal?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Nepal rank globally for gdp, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th and Nepal ranks 14th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Nepal: GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/nepal/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Nepal: GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP
Unit
current international $ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
251 places, 8,716 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

GDP, PPP (current international $) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.