Central Europe and the Baltics vs Eswatini: GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.91 current international $ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eswatini
3.05 current international $ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
36th
Eswatini rank
38th

GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Eswatini
01234199020072025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3.05 current international $ per US$ of GDP against 1.91 current international $ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 1.14 current international $ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 36th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 47 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 2.63 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.48 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.1522 current international $ per US$ of GDP Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 1.94 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.49 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.5498 current international $ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2010s 1.9 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.16 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.2615 current international $ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2020s 2.11 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.84 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.7221 current international $ per US$ of GDP Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp, Central Europe and the Baltics or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 3.05 current international $ per US$ of GDP against 1.91 current international $ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp between Central Europe and the Baltics and Eswatini?
1.14 current international $ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Eswatini?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Eswatini rank globally for gdp, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 36th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Eswatini: GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/eswatini/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Eswatini: GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP
Unit
current international $ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
251 places, 8,716 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

GDP, PPP (current international $) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.