Lithuania vs United States: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre

Lithuania
2.42 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
3.04 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
73rd
United States rank
70th

GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • United States
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020062023

How they compare

United States currently reports 3.04 million current international $ per square kilometre against 2.42 million current international $ per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 622,000 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 1.3 times Lithuania's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 73rd and United States ranks 70th of 201 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania United States Difference Ahead
1990s 390,888 current international $ per square kilometre 868,693 current international $ per square kilometre 477,805 current international $ per square kilometre United States
2000s 720,037 current international $ per square kilometre 1.38 million current international $ per square kilometre 655,865 current international $ per square kilometre United States
2010s 1.29 million current international $ per square kilometre 1.97 million current international $ per square kilometre 677,129 current international $ per square kilometre United States
2020s 2.16 million current international $ per square kilometre 2.70 million current international $ per square kilometre 549,768 current international $ per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre, Lithuania or United States?
United States, at 3.04 million current international $ per square kilometre against 2.42 million current international $ per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre between Lithuania and United States?
622,000 current international $ per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and United States?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and United States rank globally for gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 73rd and United States ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs United States: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/united-states/">Lithuania vs United States: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 8,088 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GDP, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.