High income vs San Marino: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre

High income
1.76 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
44.48 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
11th
San Marino rank
8th

GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre over time

  • High income
  • San Marino
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199020062023

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 44.48 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.76 million current international $ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 42.71 million current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes San Marino's figure about 25.2 times High income's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 11th and San Marino ranks 8th of 47 groups.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income San Marino Difference Ahead
1990s 542,038 current international $ per square kilometre 20.94 million current international $ per square kilometre 20.40 million current international $ per square kilometre San Marino
2000s 766,172 current international $ per square kilometre 30.92 million current international $ per square kilometre 30.15 million current international $ per square kilometre San Marino
2010s 1.14 million current international $ per square kilometre 30.06 million current international $ per square kilometre 28.92 million current international $ per square kilometre San Marino
2020s 1.57 million current international $ per square kilometre 39.04 million current international $ per square kilometre 37.47 million current international $ per square kilometre San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre, High income or San Marino?
San Marino, at 44.48 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.76 million current international $ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre between High income and San Marino?
42.71 million current international $ per square kilometre, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and San Marino?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do High income and San Marino rank globally for gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre?
High income ranks 11th and San Marino ranks 8th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs San Marino: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/high-income/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/high-income/san-marino/">High income vs San Marino: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 8,088 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GDP, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.