Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
1.12 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
1.10 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
112th
Tunisia rank
114th

GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tunisia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199020062023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.12 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.10 million current international $ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 16,010 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 112th and Tunisia ranks 114th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 49,925 current international $ per square kilometre 278,776 current international $ per square kilometre 228,851 current international $ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 687,719 current international $ per square kilometre 533,962 current international $ per square kilometre 153,757 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1.14 million current international $ per square kilometre 808,009 current international $ per square kilometre 328,726 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 1.04 million current international $ per square kilometre 1.01 million current international $ per square kilometre 32,004 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Tunisia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.12 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.10 million current international $ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
16,010 current international $ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia rank globally for gdp, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 112th and Tunisia ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/tunisia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 8,088 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GDP, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.