East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Faroe Islands: GDP, PPP (current international $), per capita

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
25,367 current international $ per person
in 2025
Faroe Islands
82,089 current international $ per person
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
18th
Faroe Islands rank
16th

GDP, PPP (current international $), per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Faroe Islands
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199020072025

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 82,089 current international $ per person against 25,367 current international $ per person in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 56,722 current international $ per person.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 3.2 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 18th and Faroe Islands ranks 16th of 47 groups.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 7,839 current international $ per person 40,246 current international $ per person 32,407 current international $ per person Faroe Islands
2010s 12,197 current international $ per person 51,666 current international $ per person 39,469 current international $ per person Faroe Islands
2020s 19,996 current international $ per person 73,446 current international $ per person 53,449 current international $ per person Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp, ppp (current international $), per capita, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Faroe Islands?
Faroe Islands, at 82,089 current international $ per person against 25,367 current international $ per person in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gdp, ppp (current international $), per capita between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Faroe Islands?
56,722 current international $ per person, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Faroe Islands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Faroe Islands rank globally for gdp, ppp (current international $), per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 18th and Faroe Islands ranks 16th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP, PPP (current international $), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Faroe Islands: GDP, PPP (current international $), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-current-international-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/faroe-islands/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Faroe Islands: GDP, PPP (current international $), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP, PPP (current international $), per capita
Unit
current international $ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
251 places, 8,730 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

GDP, PPP (current international $) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.