Eswatini vs Gambia: GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre

Eswatini
728,395 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
790,052 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
123rd
Gambia rank
120th

GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Gambia
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 790,052 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 728,395 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 61,657 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 123rd and Gambia ranks 120th of 198 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Gambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 316,850 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 311,677 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 5,173 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 441,003 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 434,719 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 6,284 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 606,181 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 560,427 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 45,754 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 701,282 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 728,704 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre 27,422 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Gambia?
Gambia, at 790,052 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre against 728,395 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Gambia?
61,657 constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for gdp, ppp (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 123rd and Gambia ranks 120th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Gambia: GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-ppp-constant-2021-international-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/gambia-the/">Eswatini vs Gambia: GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2021 international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 8,054 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.