Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: GDP per capita, PPP

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
3,834 current international $
in 2025
Lithuania
56,838 current international $
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
44th
Lithuania rank
42nd

GDP per capita, PPP over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lithuania
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020072025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 56,838 current international $ against 3,834 current international $ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 53,004 current international $.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 14.8 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Lithuania ranks 42nd of 45 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 1,162 current international $ 7,211 current international $ 6,049 current international $ Lithuania
2000s 1,621 current international $ 13,634 current international $ 12,013 current international $ Lithuania
2010s 2,382 current international $ 27,872 current international $ 25,491 current international $ Lithuania
2020s 3,348 current international $ 50,512 current international $ 47,164 current international $ Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp per capita, ppp, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 56,838 current international $ against 3,834 current international $ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp per capita, ppp between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
53,004 current international $, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for gdp per capita, ppp?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Lithuania ranks 42nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), published as GDP per capita, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: GDP per capita, PPP. Statizoid, drawing on International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-per-capita-ppp-current-international/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-per-capita-ppp-current-international/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: GDP per capita, PPP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)
Unit
current international $
Source
International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 8,712 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator provides values for gross domestic product (GDP) per person expressed in current international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.