Pacific island small states vs Uzbekistan: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Pacific island small states
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 5.7% against 2.1% in Pacific island small states, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.7 times Pacific island small states's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Pacific island small states ranks 25th and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Pacific island small states averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pacific island small states | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.1% | 3.3% | 2.2% | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 1.2% | -2.3% | 3.5% | Pacific island small states |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 5.1% | 4.9% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 1.8% | 5.3% | 3.5% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 4.1% | 3.6% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Pacific island small states or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 5.7% against 2.1% in Pacific island small states as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Pacific island small states and Uzbekistan?
- 3.6%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pacific island small states and Uzbekistan?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
- How do Pacific island small states and Uzbekistan rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Pacific island small states ranks 25th and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.