Nepal vs Post-demographic dividend: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Nepal
- Post-demographic dividend
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 4.5% against 1.3% in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 3.6 times Post-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 27 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.
Nepal ranks 39th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 41st of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 4 and Post-demographic dividend in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Post-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4% | 4.2% | 3.7% | Post-demographic dividend |
| 1970s | 0.3% | 2.7% | 2.3% | Post-demographic dividend |
| 1980s | 1.8% | 2.4% | 0.6% | Post-demographic dividend |
| 1990s | 2.4% | 2.0% | 0.4% | Nepal |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 1.2% | 1.6% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 1.6% | 2.9% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.0% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Nepal or Post-demographic dividend?
- Nepal, at 4.5% against 1.3% in Post-demographic dividend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Nepal and Post-demographic dividend?
- 3.2%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Post-demographic dividend?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Nepal and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Nepal ranks 39th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 41st of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.