Nepal vs OECD members: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Nepal
- OECD members
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 4.5% against 1.4% in OECD members, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 3.3 times OECD members's.
The two have swapped places 23 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was OECD members ahead.
Nepal ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 38th of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 4 and OECD members in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4% | 4.0% | 3.5% | OECD members |
| 1970s | 0.3% | 2.5% | 2.2% | OECD members |
| 1980s | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.3% | OECD members |
| 1990s | 2.4% | 1.8% | 0.6% | Nepal |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 1.1% | 1.8% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 1.5% | 3.0% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 1.3% | 1.0% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Nepal or OECD members?
- Nepal, at 4.5% against 1.4% in OECD members as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Nepal and OECD members?
- 3.1%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and OECD members?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Nepal and OECD members rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Nepal ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 38th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.