Mauritania vs Netherlands: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Mauritania
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 1.3% against 1.2% in Mauritania, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 34 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Netherlands ahead.
Mauritania ranks 141st and Netherlands ranks 139th of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.2% | 4.7% | 0.5% | Netherlands |
| 1970s | -0.3% | 2.6% | 2.9% | Netherlands |
| 1980s | -0.6% | 1.4% | 2.0% | Netherlands |
| 1990s | -0.6% | 2.7% | 3.3% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 1.2% | 0.5% | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.2% | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 1.1% | 0.9% | 0.2% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Mauritania or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 1.3% against 1.2% in Mauritania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Mauritania and Netherlands?
- 0.1%, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Netherlands?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
- How do Mauritania and Netherlands rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Mauritania ranks 141st and Netherlands ranks 139th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.