Mali vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Mali
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mali currently reports 2.6% against 2.5% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Mali ranks 103rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 104th of 215 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.4% | 6.2% | 3.7% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1980s | -0.9% | 6.7% | 7.6% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1990s | 1.2% | 3.1% | 1.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2000s | 1.4% | 3.3% | 1.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 2.4% | 1.1% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.2% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Mali or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mali, at 2.6% against 2.5% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Mali and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2025.
- How do Mali and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Mali ranks 103rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 104th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.