Maldives vs Marshall Islands: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Maldives
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 5.9% against 5.9% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 18th and Marshall Islands ranks 19th of 215 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 4 and Marshall Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.9% | 3.8% | 1.9% | Marshall Islands |
| 1980s | 8.8% | 1.7% | 7.1% | Maldives |
| 1990s | 5.5% | -0.3% | 5.8% | Maldives |
| 2000s | 2.4% | 0.9% | 1.4% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 4.8% | 1.7% | Marshall Islands |
| 2020s | 4.1% | 3.1% | 1.0% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Maldives or Marshall Islands?
- Maldives, at 5.9% against 5.9% in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Maldives and Marshall Islands?
- 0.0%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Marshall Islands?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Maldives and Marshall Islands rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Maldives ranks 18th and Marshall Islands ranks 19th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.