Lower middle income vs Monaco: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Lower middle income
- Monaco
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 9.4% against 4.6% in Lower middle income, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Monaco's figure about 2.0 times Lower middle income's.
The two have swapped places 26 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Monaco ahead.
Lower middle income ranks 6th and Monaco ranks 6th of 47 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, Lower middle income averaged higher in 3 and Monaco in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.2% | 2.7% | 1.5% | Monaco |
| 1980s | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.3% | Monaco |
| 1990s | 1.9% | 1.1% | 0.8% | Lower middle income |
| 2000s | 3.7% | 2.3% | 1.4% | Lower middle income |
| 2010s | 3.5% | 2.7% | 0.8% | Lower middle income |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 6.5% | 3.9% | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Lower middle income or Monaco?
- Monaco, at 9.4% against 4.6% in Lower middle income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Lower middle income and Monaco?
- 4.8%, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Monaco?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
- How do Lower middle income and Monaco rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Lower middle income ranks 6th and Monaco ranks 6th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.