Lithuania vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Lithuania
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2.9% against 2.9% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Lithuania ranks 88th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 89th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.8% | 0.1% | 2.9% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2000s | 5.9% | 3.5% | 2.4% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 5.1% | 3.1% | 2.0% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 1.6% | 0.6% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Lithuania or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Lithuania, at 2.9% against 2.9% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Lithuania and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Lithuania ranks 88th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 89th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.