Late-demographic dividend vs Viet Nam: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Late-demographic dividend
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 7.4% against 4.4% in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.7 times Late-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.
Late-demographic dividend ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 8th of 47 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Late-demographic dividend | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.3% | 2.3% | 1.9% | Late-demographic dividend |
| 1990s | 2.3% | 5.6% | 3.2% | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 6.4% | 5.3% | 1.1% | Late-demographic dividend |
| 2010s | 5.0% | 5.3% | 0.3% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 3.9% | 4.9% | 1.0% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Late-demographic dividend or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 7.4% against 4.4% in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Late-demographic dividend and Viet Nam?
- 3.0%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Viet Nam?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
- How do Late-demographic dividend and Viet Nam rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Late-demographic dividend ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 8th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.