Republic of Korea vs Mauritania: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Republic of Korea
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 1.2% against 1.1% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 143rd and Mauritania ranks 141st of 215 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.1% | 4.2% | 2.9% | Republic of Korea |
| 1970s | 8.7% | -0.3% | 9.0% | Republic of Korea |
| 1980s | 7.7% | -0.6% | 8.3% | Republic of Korea |
| 1990s | 6.4% | -0.6% | 7.1% | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 4.3% | 0.7% | 3.6% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 0.9% | 2.1% | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 1.1% | 0.8% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Republic of Korea or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 1.2% against 1.1% in Republic of Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Republic of Korea and Mauritania?
- 0.1%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Mauritania?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
- How do Republic of Korea and Mauritania rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Republic of Korea ranks 143rd and Mauritania ranks 141st of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.