Kazakhstan vs Pacific island small states: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Kazakhstan
- Pacific island small states
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.2% against 2.1% in Pacific island small states, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 2.5 times Pacific island small states's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Pacific island small states ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 28th and Pacific island small states ranks 25th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Pacific island small states in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Pacific island small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3.7% | 1.1% | 4.8% | Pacific island small states |
| 2000s | 7.8% | 0.2% | 7.6% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 1.8% | 1.2% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 2.2% | 0.4% | 1.8% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Kazakhstan or Pacific island small states?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.2% against 2.1% in Pacific island small states as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Kazakhstan and Pacific island small states?
- 3.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Pacific island small states?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Pacific island small states rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Kazakhstan ranks 28th and Pacific island small states ranks 25th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.