High income vs Nepal: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- High income
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 4.5% against 1.5% in High income, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 3.0 times High income's.
The two have swapped places 25 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was High income ahead.
High income ranks 36th and Nepal ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, High income averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.2% | 0.4% | 3.7% | High income |
| 1970s | 2.8% | 0.3% | 2.4% | High income |
| 1980s | 2.2% | 1.8% | 0.4% | High income |
| 1990s | 1.8% | 2.4% | 0.6% | Nepal |
| 2000s | 1.4% | 2.8% | 1.4% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 4.5% | 2.9% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 1.4% | 2.3% | 0.9% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, High income or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 4.5% against 1.5% in High income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between High income and Nepal?
- 3.0%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Nepal?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do High income and Nepal rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- High income ranks 36th and Nepal ranks 39th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.