Guam vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Guam
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Guam currently reports 4.2% against 4.1% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Guam ranks 45th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 48th of 215 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.2% | 3.6% | 2.4% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 1.8% | 0.4% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2020s | -1.8% | 1.0% | 2.8% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Guam or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Guam, at 4.2% against 4.1% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Guam and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.1%, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Guam and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Guam ranks 45th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 48th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.