Guam vs Pre-demographic dividend: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Guam
- Pre-demographic dividend
How they compare
Guam currently reports 4.2% against 1.0% in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Guam's figure about 4.2 times Pre-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Guam ahead.
Guam ranks 45th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 44th of 215 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 1 and Pre-demographic dividend in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Pre-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.2% | 2.8% | 1.7% | Pre-demographic dividend |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 1.0% | 0.4% | Guam |
| 2020s | -1.8% | -1.7% | 0.2% | Pre-demographic dividend |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Guam or Pre-demographic dividend?
- Guam, at 4.2% against 1.0% in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Guam and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 3.2%, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Guam and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Guam ranks 45th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 44th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.