French Polynesia vs Suriname: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- French Polynesia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Suriname ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 154th and Suriname ranks 151st of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8% | 7.1% | 6.4% | Suriname |
| 1970s | 2.1% | 3.0% | 0.9% | Suriname |
| 1980s | -0.6% | -1.1% | 0.5% | French Polynesia |
| 1990s | -1.5% | -1.1% | 0.5% | Suriname |
| 2000s | -0.8% | 3.1% | 3.8% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | Suriname |
| 2020s | -0.3% | -3.3% | 3.0% | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, French Polynesia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.9% against 0.9% in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between French Polynesia and Suriname?
- 0.0%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Suriname?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.
- How do French Polynesia and Suriname rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- French Polynesia ranks 154th and Suriname ranks 151st of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.