French Polynesia vs Puerto Rico: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- French Polynesia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 26 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 154th and Puerto Rico ranks 155th of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 2.1% | 4.0% | 1.9% | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | -0.6% | 2.1% | 2.7% | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | -1.5% | 2.7% | 4.2% | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | -0.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.2% | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | -0.3% | 1.2% | 1.5% | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, French Polynesia or Puerto Rico?
- French Polynesia, at 0.9% against 0.9% in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between French Polynesia and Puerto Rico?
- 0.0%, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Puerto Rico?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.
- How do French Polynesia and Puerto Rico rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- French Polynesia ranks 154th and Puerto Rico ranks 155th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.