European Union vs Indonesia: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- European Union
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 4.3% against 1.3% in European Union, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 3.2 times European Union's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was European Union ahead.
European Union ranks 39th and Indonesia ranks 42nd of 47 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, European Union averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | European Union | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.5% | 0.8% | 3.7% | European Union |
| 1970s | 3.2% | 4.5% | 1.3% | Indonesia |
| 1980s | 2.0% | 3.5% | 1.6% | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 1.9% | 2.6% | 0.7% | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 1.3% | 3.7% | 2.4% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 4.2% | 2.7% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 1.1% | 2.9% | 1.8% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, European Union or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 4.3% against 1.3% in European Union as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between European Union and Indonesia?
- 3.0%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for European Union and Indonesia?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do European Union and Indonesia rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- European Union ranks 39th and Indonesia ranks 42nd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.