El Salvador vs Mauritius: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- El Salvador
- Mauritius
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 3.5% against 3.3% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 71st and Mauritius ranks 74th of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.0% | -2.2% | 4.1% | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 1.6% | 5.5% | 3.9% | Mauritius |
| 1980s | -3.5% | 3.3% | 6.8% | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 2.6% | 4.0% | 1.4% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1.3% | 3.8% | 2.6% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2.2% | 3.6% | 1.4% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2.4% | 2.0% | 0.4% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, El Salvador or Mauritius?
- El Salvador, at 3.5% against 3.3% in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between El Salvador and Mauritius?
- 0.2%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mauritius?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Mauritius rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- El Salvador ranks 71st and Mauritius ranks 74th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.