East Asia & Pacific vs Kyrgyzstan: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 9.3% against 3.9% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 2.4 times East Asia & Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 47 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 4 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.7% | 4.4% | 0.3% | East Asia & Pacific |
| 1990s | 3.0% | -4.6% | 7.6% | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2000s | 4.3% | 3.6% | 0.6% | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2010s | 4.4% | 2.1% | 2.3% | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 4.6% | 1.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, East Asia & Pacific or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 9.3% against 3.9% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between East Asia & Pacific and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.4%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Kyrgyzstan?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.