Early-demographic dividend vs Eritrea: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Early-demographic dividend
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 6.7% against 3.2% in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 2.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Eritrea ranks 12th of 47 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Early-demographic dividend | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5% | 4.9% | 3.5% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2.3% | -2.2% | 4.5% | Early-demographic dividend |
| 2010s | 4.0% | 3.5% | 0.6% | Early-demographic dividend |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Early-demographic dividend or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 6.7% against 3.2% in Early-demographic dividend as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Early-demographic dividend and Eritrea?
- 3.5%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Eritrea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Early-demographic dividend and Eritrea rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Eritrea ranks 12th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.