Chagai vs Northern Mariana Islands: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Chagai
- Northern Mariana Islands
How they compare
Northern Mariana Islands currently reports 18.9% against 3.4% in Chagai, a difference of 15.5%.
That makes Northern Mariana Islands's figure about 5.5 times Chagai's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Northern Mariana Islands ahead.
Chagai ranks 1st and Northern Mariana Islands ranks 1st of 1 regions.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chagai averaged higher in 1 and Northern Mariana Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chagai | Northern Mariana Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.4% | 4.1% | 4.5% | Northern Mariana Islands |
| 2020s | 1.8% | -1.0% | 2.8% | Chagai |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Chagai or Northern Mariana Islands?
- Northern Mariana Islands, at 18.9% against 3.4% in Chagai as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Chagai and Northern Mariana Islands?
- 15.5%, with Northern Mariana Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Northern Mariana Islands?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Chagai and Northern Mariana Islands rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Chagai ranks 1st and Northern Mariana Islands ranks 1st of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.