Central Europe and the Baltics vs Zimbabwe: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Central Europe and the Baltics
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 6.1% against 2.6% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 47 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Europe and the Baltics | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 4.3% | -6.1% | 10.4% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2010s | 3.4% | 4.5% | 1.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.4% | 1.9% | 0.6% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Central Europe and the Baltics or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 6.1% against 2.6% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe?
- 3.5%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.