Central African Republic vs Korea: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Central African Republic
- Korea
How they compare
Korea currently reports 1.1% against 1.0% in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Korea ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 146th and Korea ranks 143rd of 215 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.2% | 6.7% | 6.9% | Korea |
| 1970s | 0.3% | 8.7% | 8.4% | Korea |
| 1980s | -0.5% | 7.7% | 8.1% | Korea |
| 1990s | -1.6% | 6.4% | 8.1% | Korea |
| 2000s | 0.8% | 4.3% | 3.6% | Korea |
| 2010s | -1.1% | 3.0% | 4.0% | Korea |
| 2020s | -0.3% | 1.9% | 2.2% | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Central African Republic or Korea?
- Korea, at 1.1% against 1.0% in Central African Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Central African Republic and Korea?
- 0.1%, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Korea?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Korea rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Central African Republic ranks 146th and Korea ranks 143rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.