Brunei Darussalam vs New Zealand: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- New Zealand
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports -0.1% against -0.2% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1975 it was New Zealand ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 180th and New Zealand ranks 182nd of 215 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8.6% | -1.0% | 9.6% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 1980s | -7.2% | 1.4% | 8.7% | New Zealand |
| 1990s | -1.7% | 1.3% | 3.0% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | -1.2% | 1.6% | 2.8% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | -0.9% | 1.4% | 2.3% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | -0.2% | 0.3% | 0.6% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Brunei Darussalam or New Zealand?
- Brunei Darussalam, at -0.1% against -0.2% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand?
- 0.1%, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2025.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 180th and New Zealand ranks 182nd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.