Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3.1% against 2.9% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 86th and Eswatini ranks 83rd of 215 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.5% | 1.2% | 13.3% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 4.7% | 2.8% | 1.9% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.7% | 2.4% | 1.3% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 3.8% | 1.0% | 2.7% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 3.1% against 2.9% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
- 0.2%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 86th and Eswatini ranks 83rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.