Aruba vs Central Europe and the Baltics: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Aruba
- Central Europe and the Baltics
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 6.2% against 2.6% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.4 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 16th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 19th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Central Europe and the Baltics in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Central Europe and the Baltics | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 4.3% | 4.2% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 3.4% | 2.1% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2020s | 3.8% | 2.4% | 1.4% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Aruba or Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Aruba, at 6.2% against 2.6% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Aruba and Central Europe and the Baltics?
- 3.6%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Central Europe and the Baltics?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Aruba ranks 16th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 19th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.