Antigua and Barbuda vs Nepal: GDP per capita growth
GDP per capita growth over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 4.5% against 4.5% in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 39th of 215 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5.9% | 1.0% | 4.9% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1980s | 6.5% | 1.8% | 4.8% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1990s | 1.9% | 2.4% | 0.5% | Nepal |
| 2000s | 1.7% | 2.8% | 1.1% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 4.5% | 4.0% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 2.3% | 1.3% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita growth, Antigua and Barbuda or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 4.5% against 4.5% in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita growth between Antigua and Barbuda and Nepal?
- 0.0%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Nepal?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2025.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Nepal rank globally for gdp per capita growth?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 39th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.