Mongolia vs Suriname: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Mongolia
- Suriname
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 7,108 current US$ against 7,070 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 38 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Suriname ahead.
Mongolia ranks 117th and Suriname ranks 118th of 211 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1,393 current US$ | 2,272 current US$ | 879.2 current US$ | Suriname |
| 1990s | 640.05 current US$ | 1,541 current US$ | 901.28 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2000s | 1,079 current US$ | 3,900 current US$ | 2,821 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 3,872 current US$ | 7,670 current US$ | 3,798 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 5,535 current US$ | 5,904 current US$ | 368.91 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Mongolia or Suriname?
- Mongolia, at 7,108 current US$ against 7,070 current US$ in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Mongolia and Suriname?
- 38 current US$, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Suriname?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Suriname rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Mongolia ranks 117th and Suriname ranks 118th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.