Malta vs Sint Maarten: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Malta
- Sint Maarten
How they compare
Malta currently reports 47,907 current US$ against 42,978 current US$ in Sint Maarten, a difference of 4,929 current US$.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Sint Maarten's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sint Maarten ahead.
Malta ranks 34th and Sint Maarten ranks 37th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Sint Maarten in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Sint Maarten | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21,262 current US$ | 25,528 current US$ | 4,267 current US$ | Sint Maarten |
| 2010s | 26,929 current US$ | 32,395 current US$ | 5,466 current US$ | Sint Maarten |
| 2020s | 39,737 current US$ | 37,399 current US$ | 2,338 current US$ | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Malta or Sint Maarten?
- Malta, at 47,907 current US$ against 42,978 current US$ in Sint Maarten as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Malta and Sint Maarten?
- 4,929 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sint Maarten?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Sint Maarten rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Malta ranks 34th and Sint Maarten ranks 37th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.