Lithuania vs Low income: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Low income
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 32,959 current US$ against 837.36 current US$ in Low income, a difference of 32,122 current US$.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 39.4 times Low income's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 52nd and Low income ranks 46th of 213 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,735 current US$ | 271.38 current US$ | 2,464 current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 7,940 current US$ | 461.15 current US$ | 7,478 current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 15,732 current US$ | 702.08 current US$ | 15,030 current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 26,634 current US$ | 754.94 current US$ | 25,879 current US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Lithuania or Low income?
- Lithuania, at 32,959 current US$ against 837.36 current US$ in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Lithuania and Low income?
- 32,122 current US$, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Low income?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Low income rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 52nd and Low income ranks 46th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.