Kyrgyzstan vs Palestine: GDP per capita (current US$) (Country official)
GDP per capita (current US$) (Country official) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 3,171 current US$ against 3,081 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 90 current US$.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 162nd and Palestine ranks 159th of 214 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 351.87 current US$ | 1,367 current US$ | 1,015 current US$ | Palestine |
| 2000s | 530.15 current US$ | 1,565 current US$ | 1,035 current US$ | Palestine |
| 2010s | 1,183 current US$ | 3,281 current US$ | 2,098 current US$ | Palestine |
| 2020s | 2,009 current US$ | 3,420 current US$ | 1,411 current US$ | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Kyrgyzstan or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 3,171 current US$ against 3,081 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Kyrgyzstan and Palestine?
- 90 current US$, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Palestine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Palestine rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 162nd and Palestine ranks 159th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.