Ecuador vs Mongolia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 7,125 current US$ against 7,108 current US$ in Mongolia, a difference of 17 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 116th and Mongolia ranks 117th of 211 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1,844 current US$ | 1,393 current US$ | 451.27 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 1,884 current US$ | 640.05 current US$ | 1,244 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2,801 current US$ | 1,079 current US$ | 1,722 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 5,846 current US$ | 3,872 current US$ | 1,974 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 6,452 current US$ | 5,535 current US$ | 916.77 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Ecuador, at 7,125 current US$ against 7,108 current US$ in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 17 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 116th and Mongolia ranks 117th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.