Belarus vs North Macedonia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Belarus
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 10,490 current US$ against 10,279 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 211 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Belarus ranks 102nd and North Macedonia ranks 100th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,514 current US$ | 1,941 current US$ | 427.79 current US$ | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 3,164 current US$ | 3,153 current US$ | 10.66 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 6,585 current US$ | 5,710 current US$ | 874.41 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 8,135 current US$ | 8,390 current US$ | 255.65 current US$ | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Belarus or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 10,490 current US$ against 10,279 current US$ in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Belarus and North Macedonia?
- 211 current US$, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and North Macedonia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and North Macedonia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Belarus ranks 102nd and North Macedonia ranks 100th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.