Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Aruba
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 38,591 current US$ against 37,507 current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 1,084 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 43rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 44th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24,084 current US$ | 23,843 current US$ | 241.32 current US$ | Aruba |
| 2010s | 27,095 current US$ | 28,354 current US$ | 1,260 current US$ | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2020s | 30,796 current US$ | 30,456 current US$ | 340.56 current US$ | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Aruba, at 38,591 current US$ against 37,507 current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 1,084 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Aruba ranks 43rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 44th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.