Serbia vs Sri Lanka: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Serbia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.59 million current LCU against 1.51 million current LCU in Sri Lanka, a difference of 81,510 current LCU.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Serbia ranks 39th and Sri Lanka ranks 40th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,247 current LCU | 38,814 current LCU | 25,567 current LCU | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 248,412 current LCU | 129,940 current LCU | 118,472 current LCU | Serbia |
| 2010s | 632,105 current LCU | 536,469 current LCU | 95,636 current LCU | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1.22 million current LCU | 1.12 million current LCU | 98,916 current LCU | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Serbia or Sri Lanka?
- Serbia, at 1.59 million current LCU against 1.51 million current LCU in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 81,510 current LCU, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Serbia and Sri Lanka rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Serbia ranks 39th and Sri Lanka ranks 40th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.