Rwanda vs Serbia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1.61 million current LCU against 1.59 million current LCU in Serbia, a difference of 18,360 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 39th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57,046 current LCU | 13,247 current LCU | 43,799 current LCU | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 181,131 current LCU | 248,412 current LCU | 67,281 current LCU | Serbia |
| 2010s | 521,542 current LCU | 632,105 current LCU | 110,564 current LCU | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1.14 million current LCU | 1.22 million current LCU | 75,731 current LCU | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Rwanda, at 1.61 million current LCU against 1.59 million current LCU in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 18,360 current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 39th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.