Qatar vs Thailand: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Qatar
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 264,922 current LCU against 263,991 current LCU in Qatar, a difference of 931 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Qatar ahead.
Qatar ranks 87th and Thailand ranks 86th of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 5 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 43,882 current LCU | 7,417 current LCU | 36,465 current LCU | Qatar |
| 1980s | 71,200 current LCU | 21,965 current LCU | 49,234 current LCU | Qatar |
| 1990s | 61,530 current LCU | 63,484 current LCU | 1,954 current LCU | Thailand |
| 2000s | 173,746 current LCU | 111,998 current LCU | 61,747 current LCU | Qatar |
| 2010s | 298,501 current LCU | 195,668 current LCU | 102,833 current LCU | Qatar |
| 2020s | 267,263 current LCU | 243,828 current LCU | 23,435 current LCU | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Qatar or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 264,922 current LCU against 263,991 current LCU in Qatar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Qatar and Thailand?
- 931 current LCU, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Thailand?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
- How do Qatar and Thailand rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Qatar ranks 87th and Thailand ranks 86th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.