Qatar vs Suriname: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Qatar
- Suriname
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 263,991 current LCU against 263,425 current LCU in Suriname, a difference of 566 current LCU.
Across all 56 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 87th and Suriname ranks 88th of 212 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 43,882 current LCU | 2.47 current LCU | 43,880 current LCU | Qatar |
| 1980s | 71,200 current LCU | 4.94 current LCU | 71,195 current LCU | Qatar |
| 1990s | 61,530 current LCU | 519.12 current LCU | 61,011 current LCU | Qatar |
| 2000s | 173,746 current LCU | 10,194 current LCU | 163,552 current LCU | Qatar |
| 2010s | 298,501 current LCU | 34,959 current LCU | 263,542 current LCU | Qatar |
| 2020s | 267,263 current LCU | 168,360 current LCU | 98,903 current LCU | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Qatar or Suriname?
- Qatar, at 263,991 current LCU against 263,425 current LCU in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Qatar and Suriname?
- 566 current LCU, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Suriname?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
- How do Qatar and Suriname rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Qatar ranks 87th and Suriname ranks 88th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.