Nicaragua vs Poland: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Nicaragua
- Poland
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 116,221 current LCU against 106,873 current LCU in Poland, a difference of 9,348 current LCU.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 106th and Poland ranks 108th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,655 current LCU | 8,547 current LCU | 2,891 current LCU | Poland |
| 2000s | 20,036 current LCU | 26,356 current LCU | 6,320 current LCU | Poland |
| 2010s | 52,074 current LCU | 47,651 current LCU | 4,423 current LCU | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 90,121 current LCU | 86,510 current LCU | 3,611 current LCU | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Nicaragua or Poland?
- Nicaragua, at 116,221 current LCU against 106,873 current LCU in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Nicaragua and Poland?
- 9,348 current LCU, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Poland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Nicaragua and Poland rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Nicaragua ranks 106th and Poland ranks 108th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.