Mozambique vs Puerto Rico: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Mozambique
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 40,620 current LCU against 40,177 current LCU in Mozambique, a difference of 443 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Mozambique ranks 152nd and Puerto Rico ranks 151st of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,117 current LCU | 11,767 current LCU | 9,650 current LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 10,011 current LCU | 21,282 current LCU | 11,271 current LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 24,268 current LCU | 29,017 current LCU | 4,749 current LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 37,390 current LCU | 36,059 current LCU | 1,331 current LCU | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Mozambique or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 40,620 current LCU against 40,177 current LCU in Mozambique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Mozambique and Puerto Rico?
- 443 current LCU, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Puerto Rico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Mozambique and Puerto Rico rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Mozambique ranks 152nd and Puerto Rico ranks 151st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.