Lesotho vs Palau: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Lesotho
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 19,532 current LCU against 19,480 current LCU in Lesotho, a difference of 52 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Palau ahead.
Lesotho ranks 183rd and Palau ranks 182nd of 213 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 99.59 current LCU | 1,481 current LCU | 1,382 current LCU | Palau |
| 1980s | 398.19 current LCU | 3,768 current LCU | 3,370 current LCU | Palau |
| 1990s | 1,782 current LCU | 7,045 current LCU | 5,263 current LCU | Palau |
| 2000s | 5,277 current LCU | 9,020 current LCU | 3,743 current LCU | Palau |
| 2010s | 12,562 current LCU | 14,087 current LCU | 1,526 current LCU | Palau |
| 2020s | 17,160 current LCU | 15,840 current LCU | 1,321 current LCU | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Lesotho or Palau?
- Palau, at 19,532 current LCU against 19,480 current LCU in Lesotho as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Lesotho and Palau?
- 52 current LCU, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Palau?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
- How do Lesotho and Palau rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Lesotho ranks 183rd and Palau ranks 182nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.